Breeder snapshot
Charles Feldmann – Sheldon, MO is linked to 12 public inspection reports from USDA.
Sheldon, Missouri
Charles Feldmann – Sheldon, MO is linked to 12 public inspection reports from USDA.
Inspection Dog Counts
Charles Feldmann – Sheldon, MO is linked to 12 public inspection reports, carrying 4 inspector findings, from November 2014 to December 2025.
Across 12 inspections between November 2014 and December 2025, inspectors recorded between 1 dog and 252 dogs at Charles Feldmann – Sheldon, MO. The most recent count was 148 dogs on December 2, 2025.
| Date | Licence | Type | Dogs counted | Inspector findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 25, 2014 | USDA 43-A-1704 | Routine inspection | 159 dogs | None |
| February 24, 2016 | USDA 43-A-1704 | Routine inspection | 186 dogs | 4 findings |
| February 26, 2016 | USDA 43-A-1704 | Focused inspection | 1 dog | None |
| May 11, 2016 | USDA 43-A-1704 | Routine inspection | 205 dogs | None |
| June 13, 2017 | USDA 43-A-1704 | Routine inspection | 180 dogs | None |
| September 20, 2018 | USDA 43-A-1704 | Routine inspection | 216 dogs | None |
| November 26, 2019 | USDA 43-A-1704 | Routine inspection | 213 dogs | None |
| July 7, 2021 | USDA 43-A-1704 | Routine inspection | 252 dogs | None |
| January 6, 2023 | USDA 43-A-1704 | Re-license inspection | 165 dogs | None |
| March 22, 2023 | USDA 43-A-1704 | Routine inspection | 193 dogs | None |
| March 12, 2025 | USDA 43-A-1704 | Routine inspection | 76 dogs | None |
| December 2, 2025 | USDA 43-A-1704 | Re-license inspection | 148 dogs | None |
186 dogs recorded (92 adults · 94 puppies).
There was a red, adult, female Poodle (0A02327419) who had dried fecal material matted on her hind end and down the back side of her hind legs. The mats covered approximately 1/3 of the hair on the back side of the dog's legs from the rump down to the hocks. The dog apparently had loose stools at some point but the feces in the enclosure at the time of inspection appeared to have fairly normal consistency. The licensee was unaware that the dog had loose stools previously and had not noticed the fecal matter on the dog's hind end until the inspection. Dried, fecal material in hair coats poses a health risk for the animals, especially since they tend to lick their hair to groom themselves. The licensee must remove all the dried fecal material from this dog's coat and ensure that all dogs receive adequate veterinary care at all times. This includes proper maintenance of coats to avoid matting of hair. TO BE CORRECTED BY: 26 February 2016
Maintenance and replacement of surfaces. There were numerous large, upright wood posts in many of the enclosures, supporting the overhead shade structures. Many of the older posts were worn from chewing/scratching. Some were stained/soiled indicating that they were not impervious to moisture and could not be readily cleaned and sanitized. There were also many wooden divider boards between enclosures which were also heavily chewed and in some cases soiled with stains. The outdoor, concrete floors of some of the older enclosures did not appear to be impervious to moisture and some had multiple stains from dog urine/waste. There were wet spots on these concrete floors at the time of inspection which appeared to absorb directly into the concrete. The licensee stated they have sealed the floors before but it was not happening very frequently. Surfaces which are not maintained appropriately tend to be difficult to readily clean and sanitize; this poses a health risk for the dogs. The licensee must ensure that all surfaces are maintained on a regular basis. The licensee must also ensure that surfaces which cannot be readily cleaned and sanitized are replaced when worn or soiled. TO BE CORRECTED BY: 26 April 2016
Cleaning. Some of the enclosures housing adults with young puppies had 2x4 wood pieces along the bottom of the walls, just a few inches above the floor. The boards were intended to prevent the puppies from getting crushed when their dam laid down. Some of the boards had turned brown in color from dirt and debris accumulating on them and they did not appear to have been properly sanitized prior to the litters using them. These boards were in very close proximity to the neonate puppies lying beneath them and they were in direct contact with the some of the older puppies. The walls (both indoor and out) and floors of some of the enclosures had dirt on them which appeared to have built up over time. The licensee stated he had not been sanitizing the walls of the shelters every two weeks. There were also wooden divider panels between some of the enclosures along their outdoor fencing. Some of these boards were worn and soiled brown in some spots. The insides of some of the sheltered buildings had excessive accumulations of dust and other indications that the areas weren't being cleaned often enough. In one of the buildings there were numerous bird droppings present on the tops of the large, wooden dog shelters. Another building had a bird nest in the corner, just a few feet from a dog's enclosure. In that same building, the wall almost appeared to be brown, but a light rub of the inspector's finger easily demonstrated that the wall underneath the dust was actually white. One whelp building had a noticeable amount of dark brown/black, pin point-sized spots on parts of the ceiling, outlets, power cords, electrical box, etc. The licensee acknowledged that these dark spots were due to fly speck. The storage area for medications and husbandry supplies in that same building had a thick layer of dust on some items like the plastic containers used to store the food. Enclosures and housing buildings which are not cleaned and sanitized at appropriate intervals can harbor bacteria, viruses, and other pathogens which increase the risk of the dogs getting sick. The licensee must ensure that all hard surfaces with which the dogs come in contact (walls, insides of shelters, divider boards, etc.) are spot-cleaned daily and sanitized at least once every two weeks. Furthermore, the licensee must ensure that all other surfaces of housing facilities (not in contact with the dogs) are cleaned and sanitized when necessary to satisfy generally accepted husbandry standards and practices. TO BE CORRECTED BY: 1 April 2016
Many of the food receptacles in the facility used by the dogs had a coating of a brown organic material inside part of them and/or around their edges. Many of these feeders were screwed into the walls of the enclosures making it difficult for the licensee to properly clean and sanitize them every two weeks. In one building with open rafters rather than a ceiling, there was evidence of white bird droppings along the insides of the some of the feeders. Food receptacles which aren't kept clean, properly sanitized, and protected from bird excreta increase the risk of dogs ingesting harmful pathogens which could make them ill. The licensee must ensure that all food receptacles are kept clean and sanitized at least once every two weeks. Furthermore, the licensee must ensure that food receptacles are located so as to minimize contamination by excreta and pests. TO BE CORRECTED BY: 11 March 2016
Yes. Inspectors recorded 4 problems across 12 visits. Each one is quoted in full above, in the inspector's own words.
At the most recent inspection on file, December 2, 2025, inspectors counted 148 dogs (68 adults · 80 puppies). The count is taken by the inspector on the day, so it moves with litters and sales.
The records name Cockapoo, Cocker Spaniel, English Cream Golden Retriever, Golden Retriever, Goldendoodle, Labradoodle, Labrador Retriever, Mini Australian Shepherd, Poodle, Shihpoo, Standard Poodle. Breeds come from the inspection paperwork, so a kennel may keep others that were never written down.
All 691 breeders on file in Missouri · English Cream Golden Retriever breeders
This profile includes public USDA and Ohio inspection and licensing records. Notes describe conditions documented on the inspection dates shown.
If information is inaccurate or out of date, please let us know.
Submit a correctionWe collect and organize public records from government sources, including USDA APHIS and state departments of agriculture. We do not conduct our own inspections.
Learn how our data works →They summarize public licensing and inspection records from the agencies shown.
Records are updated as new public documents are collected and reviewed.
No. Pawthenticity organizes public records and does not provide endorsements.
Pawthenticity is a nonprofit organization. Your support helps us make public records more accessible.
Real records. Brighter tomorrows.