Breeder snapshot
Dog breeder in Holden, MO. 23 dogs at last count. USDA inspectors cited 1 problem across 10 reports. Every report is free to read.
Holden, Missouri
Dog breeder in Holden, MO. 23 dogs at last count. USDA inspectors cited 1 problem across 10 reports. Every report is free to read.
Troy & Tina Martin – TNT Puppies is linked to 10 public inspection reports, carrying 1 inspector finding, from March 2017 to July 2026.
Across 10 inspections between March 2017 and July 2026, inspectors recorded between 16 dogs and 46 dogs at Troy & Tina Martin – TNT Puppies. The most recent count was 23 dogs on July 21, 2026.
| Date | Licence | Type | Dogs counted | Inspector findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 14, 2017 | USDA 43-A-6180 | Pre-license inspection #1 | 16 dogs | None |
| October 19, 2017 | USDA 43-A-6180 | Routine inspection | 33 dogs | None |
| February 11, 2019 | USDA 43-A-6180 | Routine inspection | 33 dogs | None |
| May 12, 2021 | USDA 43-A-6180 | Routine inspection | 26 dogs | None |
| September 21, 2022 | USDA 43-A-6180 | Routine inspection | 24 dogs | 1 finding |
| January 4, 2023 | USDA 43-A-6180 | Re-license inspection | 24 dogs | None |
| August 28, 2023 | USDA 43-A-6180 | Routine inspection | 46 dogs | None |
| March 17, 2025 | USDA 43-A-6180 | Routine inspection | 16 dogs | None |
| February 6, 2026 | USDA 43-A-6180 | Re-license inspection | 23 dogs | None |
| July 21, 2026 | USDA 43-A-6180 | Routine inspection | 23 dogs | None |
24 dogs recorded (17 adults · 7 puppies).
The following medications used to treat the dogs at the facility have gone past their labeled expiration dates. The recorded expiration date on one bottle of Pet tabs was 05/21. The recorded expiration date on one bottle of Metoclopramide Oral was 1/28/21. These medications are intermingled with other products that are currently being used at the facility and are therefore ready for use. The usage of expired medical materials such as drugs, fluids, or sutures on regulated animals is not considered to be an acceptable veterinary practice and does not constitute adequate veterinary care. The effectiveness of the dosage level and expected results when expired drugs are administrated to animals could be drastically changed or may not work as anticipated. The expected results cannot be guaranteed and the animals may experience pain, distress due to mistreatment, unrelieved symptoms or unexpected side effects. Failure to properly label medications or other medical products as being expired and storing them with unexpired medical materials could lead to the unintentional use on regulated animals. The licensee must either dispose of all such expired medical drugs and materials or segregate them in an appropriately labeled, physically separate location from non-expired medical drugs and materials. Correct by 10/5/21. * No expiration dates were recorded on one bottle of Panacur liquid and one bottle of Ponazuril liquid. These medications were intermingled with other products that are currently being used at the facility and is therefore ready for use. These medications were obtained from the attending veterinarian. Medications must be labeled with appropriate and accurate information to ensure that the contents of the container can be known with certainty. The effectiveness and expected results could be drastically changed or may not work as anticipated if the expiration date is unknown. The usage of any medication with an unknown expiration date on regulated animals is not considered to be an acceptable veterinary practice and does not constitute adequate veterinary care. The licensee must ensure that all medications used in the facility have a current expiration date recorded. Correct by 10/5/21.
Yes. Inspectors recorded 1 problem across 10 visits. Each one is quoted in full above, in the inspector's own words.
At the most recent inspection on file, July 21, 2026, inspectors counted 23 dogs (12 adults · 11 puppies). The count is taken by the inspector on the day, so it moves with litters and sales.
The records name Cavalier King Charles Spaniel, Cocker Spaniel. Breeds come from the inspection paperwork, so a kennel may keep others that were never written down.
Kennels near this one, and others recording the same breeds.
| Kennel | Location | Why related | Dogs | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melissa B Payne | Bates City, MO | Nearby · 5 mi | 51 dogs | 1 note |
| Brandon Russow – Russow Ranch | Odessa, MO | Nearby · 5 mi | 180 dogs | No notes |
| Nichole Richey | Holden, MO | Nearby · 6 mi | 102 dogs | No notes |
| Kimberly Ann Gilmore – Dogwood Acres | Kingsville, MO | Nearby · 9 mi | 37 dogs | No notes |
| Aaron B Martin | Chula, MO | Same breed · Cavalier King Charles Spaniel | 21 dogs | No notes |
| Alisa Breedlove – Breedloves Unique Kennel | Waynesville, MO | Same breed · Cavalier King Charles Spaniel | 213 dogs | No notes |
| Aleica Davis | Falcon, MO | Same breed · Cocker Spaniel | 40 dogs | No notes |
| Alvin & Mary Good – Marys Pets | Memphis, MO | Same breed · Cocker Spaniel | 36 dogs | No notes |
Showing 8 related kennelsView all 691 kennels in Missouri →
Share your firsthand experience getting a puppy from this breeder. Responses are anonymous, reviewed before publication, and kept separate from public inspection records.
This profile includes public USDA and Ohio inspection and licensing records. Notes describe conditions documented on the inspection dates shown.
If information is inaccurate or out of date, please let us know.
Submit a correctionWe collect and organize public records from government sources, including USDA APHIS and state departments of agriculture. We do not conduct our own inspections.
Learn how our data works →They summarize public licensing and inspection records from the agencies shown.
Records are updated as new public documents are collected and reviewed.
No. Pawthenticity organizes public records and does not provide endorsements.
Pawthenticity is reader supported. Your gift helps bring more public inspection records into the open, so people can make better-informed choices for dogs.
Support the database →