Breeder snapshot
Dog breeder in Princeton, MO (Cockapoo +5). 90 dogs at last count. USDA inspectors cited 2 problems across 15 reports. Every report is free to read.
Princeton, Missouri
Dog breeder in Princeton, MO (Cockapoo +5). 90 dogs at last count. USDA inspectors cited 2 problems across 15 reports. Every report is free to read.
Junior Detweiler – Princeton, MO is linked to 15 public inspection reports, carrying 2 inspector findings, from September 2014 to August 2026.
Across 15 inspections between September 2014 and August 2026, inspectors recorded between 90 dogs and 189 dogs at Junior Detweiler – Princeton, MO. The most recent count was 90 dogs on August 19, 2026.
| Date | Licence | Type | Dogs counted | Inspector findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 5, 2014 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Routine inspection | 125 dogs | None |
| September 23, 2015 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Routine inspection | 112 dogs | 2 findings |
| January 27, 2016 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Routine inspection | 155 dogs | None |
| January 4, 2017 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Routine inspection | 189 dogs | None |
| November 28, 2017 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Routine inspection | 144 dogs | None |
| November 7, 2018 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Routine inspection | 160 dogs | None |
| November 19, 2019 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Routine inspection | 148 dogs | None |
| February 5, 2021 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Routine inspection | 175 dogs | None |
| October 7, 2021 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Routine inspection | 173 dogs | None |
| October 24, 2022 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Routine inspection | 151 dogs | None |
| March 16, 2023 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Re-license inspection | 120 dogs | None |
| October 20, 2023 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Routine inspection | 129 dogs | None |
| October 23, 2024 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Routine inspection | 138 dogs | None |
| March 24, 2026 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Re-license inspection | 95 dogs | None |
| August 19, 2026 | USDA 43-A-5761 | Routine inspection | 90 dogs | None |
112 dogs recorded (74 adults · 38 puppies).
A young male Rottweiler, ID#32315, was observed with an open wound on the end of his tail at the tail dock area. The wound had a granular appearance around the outer edge and was open, reddened and inflamed in the inner area of the wound. According to the licensee the puppy was held back two weeks ago because of this wound. The licensee stated that he had been putting NuStock on the wound and it would close but then reopen. The licensee has not consulted with a veterinarian for care or treatment on this wound. The unhealed wound could be a sign of a medical condition that requires veterinary care. The licensee must have this puppy evaluated by a veterinarian for an appropriate diagnosis and treatment plan. The licensee must ensure that all animals receive adequate veterinary care at all times. To be corrected by: 25 Sept 15
Sanitization of food receptacles *** The licensee has two large plastic barrels used for storage of open bags of food. On the inside wall of the food barrels there is an accumulation of a dark sticky substance. On the underside area of the lid of one of the food barrels there appears to be several dark spots which are consistent with fly spat. When questioned as to when was the last time these barrels had been cleaned and sanitized the licensee could not remember. This accumulation of the dark sticky substance and fly spat on the lids could become a disease hazard to the dogs. The licensee must clean and sanitize these food storage barrels and ensure that primary enclosures, food and water receptacles are cleaned and sanitized at least once every two weeks to prevent an accumulation of dirt, debris, food waste, excreta and other disease hazards. To be corrected by: 28 Sept 2015
Yes. Inspectors recorded 2 problems across 15 visits. Each one is quoted in full above, in the inspector's own words.
At the most recent inspection on file, August 19, 2026, inspectors counted 90 dogs (54 adults · 36 puppies). The count is taken by the inspector on the day, so it moves with litters and sales.
The records name Cockapoo, Cocker Spaniel, Mini Schnauzer, Pomeranian, Rottweiler, Schnoodle. Breeds come from the inspection paperwork, so a kennel may keep others that were never written down.
Kennels near this one, and others recording the same breeds.
| Kennel | Location | Why related | Dogs | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David J Borntreger | Princeton, MO | Nearby · < 1 mi | 156 dogs | No notes |
| Glen R Otto | Princeton, MO | Nearby · < 1 mi | 156 dogs | No notes |
| Lois H & Kim Stark | Princeton, MO | Nearby · 9 mi | 94 dogs | No notes |
| Angie Thompson | Cainsville, MO | Nearby · 11 mi | 41 dogs | No notes |
| Aleica Davis | Falcon, MO | Same breed · Cockapoo | 40 dogs | No notes |
| Amy Demelt | Amazonia, MO | Same breed · Cockapoo | 86 dogs | No notes |
| Alvin & Mary Good – Marys Pets | Memphis, MO | Same breed · Cocker Spaniel | 36 dogs | No notes |
| Betty Lawson – Flying Goose Ranch | Mountain Grove, MO | Same breed · Cocker Spaniel | 71 dogs | 8 notes |
| Benjamin DE Schwartz – Scenic Ridge Kennels | Licking, MO | Same breed · Mini Schnauzer | 184 dogs | No notes |
| Carol Novak – Evergreen Acres | Phillipsburg, MO | Same breed · Mini Schnauzer | 81 dogs | 1 note |
| Alisa Breedlove – Breedloves Unique Kennel | Waynesville, MO | Same breed · Pomeranian | 213 dogs | No notes |
| Allen Strenke + Jerry McClure – Jerrens Kennel | Grant City, MO | Same breed · Pomeranian | 42 dogs | 20 notes |
Showing 12 related kennelsView all 691 kennels in Missouri →
Share your firsthand experience getting a puppy from this breeder. Responses are anonymous, reviewed before publication, and kept separate from public inspection records.
This profile includes public USDA and Ohio inspection and licensing records. Notes describe conditions documented on the inspection dates shown.
If information is inaccurate or out of date, please let us know.
Submit a correctionWe collect and organize public records from government sources, including USDA APHIS and state departments of agriculture. We do not conduct our own inspections.
Learn how our data works →They summarize public licensing and inspection records from the agencies shown.
Records are updated as new public documents are collected and reviewed.
No. Pawthenticity organizes public records and does not provide endorsements.
Pawthenticity is reader supported. Your gift helps bring more public inspection records into the open, so people can make better-informed choices for dogs.
Support the database →