Breeder snapshot
Bichon Frise breeder in Sugarcreek, OH. 62 dogs at last count. USDA and Ohio inspectors cited 7 problems across 16 reports. Every report is free to read.
Sugarcreek, Ohio
Bichon Frise breeder in Sugarcreek, OH. 62 dogs at last count. USDA and Ohio inspectors cited 7 problems across 16 reports. Every report is free to read.
Marvin E Schmucker – Sugarcreek, OH is linked to 16 public inspection reports, carrying 7 inspector findings, from August 2014 to May 2026.
Across 15 inspections between August 2014 and May 2026, inspectors recorded between 41 dogs and 80 dogs at Marvin E Schmucker – Sugarcreek, OH. The most recent count was 62 dogs on May 6, 2026.
| Date | Licence | Type | Dogs counted | Inspector findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 14, 2014 | USDA 31-A-0470 | Routine inspection | 67 dogs | None |
| October 14, 2015 | USDA 31-A-0470 | Routine inspection | 59 dogs | 1 finding |
| June 22, 2016 | USDA 31-A-0470 | Routine inspection | 59 dogs | None |
| October 5, 2016 | USDA 31-A-0620 | Pre-license inspection #2 | 68 dogs | None |
| March 23, 2017 | USDA 31-A-0620 | Attempted inspection | No access | None |
| May 11, 2017 | USDA 31-A-0620 | Routine inspection | 52 dogs | None |
| August 20, 2018 | USDA 31-A-0620 | Routine inspection | 58 dogs | None |
| July 24, 2019 | USDA 31-A-0620 | Routine inspection | 75 dogs | None |
| February 14, 2022 | USDA 31-A-0620 | Routine inspection | 41 dogs | None |
| November 2, 2022 | USDA 31-A-0620 | Re-license inspection | 80 dogs | None |
| February 9, 2023 | USDA 31-A-0620 | Routine inspection | 69 dogs | None |
| March 19, 2025 | USDA 31-A-0620 | Routine inspection | 72 dogs | 4 findings |
| May 13, 2025 | USDA 31-A-0620 | Routine inspection | 71 dogs | None |
| August 13, 2025 | Ohio CB0034KX | Routine inspection | 56 dogs | 1 finding |
| September 8, 2025 | USDA 31-A-0620 | Re-license inspection | 66 dogs | None |
| May 6, 2026 | USDA 31-A-0620 | Routine inspection | 62 dogs | 1 finding |
59 dogs recorded (45 adults · 14 puppies).
The indoor portion of the sheltered housing facility is dirty, with excessive cobwebs and dust accumulated on the ceiling, hair caught on the wire tops of primary enclosures, and the floor is littered with feces and debris. The degree of cleanliness on the inside of this facility is not sufficient to prevent or eliminate odors on the inside of the facility. Dirty conditions caused by inadequate cleaning can facilitate transmission of disease to the animals housed therein, as well as attract pests which can cause discomfort or pose another risk of disease transmission. All surfaces of housing facilities must be cleaned and sanitized when necessary to satisfy generally accepted husbandry standards and practices. Correct by cleaning and sanitizing all surfaces of the housing facility as needed to prevent odors, insects, pests or vermin, and to satisfy generally accepted husbandry standards and practices. Correct by: 21 October 2015.
72 dogs recorded (40 adults · 32 puppies).
The cage cards being used at the facility as identification for 32 puppies did not contain all required information. The cage cards did not contain a unique number identifying each puppy or a description and the puppies were not microchipped. Complete and accurate records are needed to ensure each animal's identity can be known with certainty and to facilitate the ability to trace all puppies. The facility shall make, keep, and maintain records or forms which fully and correctly disclose the following information concerning each dog or cat purchased or otherwise acquired, owned, held, or otherwise in his or her possession or under his or her control, or which is transported, euthanized, sold, or otherwise disposed of by that dealer or exhibitor. The records shall include any offspring born of any animal while in his or her possession or under his or her control. Correct by 07-April-2025.
The food being provided in a self-feeding receptacle for 2 adult dogs is not being adequately protected from contamination. The food receptacle has an open top and is oriented below a post holding a deep cell battery that has excessive corrosion present. The wooden frame holding the battery has an approximately 1-inch of yellow/orange/white buildup around the base and there is dried liquid residue down the frame. Failure to ensure that food is free of contamination can lead to ingestion of toxic substances and negatively impact the health of the animals. The licensee must ensure that food is uncontaminated, wholesome, palatable, and of sufficient quantity and nutritive value to maintain the normal condition and weight of the animal. Correct by, 07-April-2025.
Fecal testing has not been performed in accordance with the schedule that was approved by the Attending Veterinarian. Failure to follow a written and Attending Veterinarian approved schedule for sampling and treatment of parasites and other pests can lead to a delay in treatment for the animals in the facility. The licensee must ensure that sampling and treatment of parasites and other pests in accordance with a schedule approved by the Attending Veterinarian is followed. Correct by, 07-April-2025.
The facility does not have medical records as described in this section. The identification of the dogs is recorded using tag numbers that are no longer in use. The dogs are currently identified using microchips that are not recorded in the medical records. The facility states that all dogs have received the required vaccinations, but all vaccinations have not been recorded in the medical records. It is required that all preventions, vaccinations, treatments, and testing be recorded in the animal’s medical record. Failure to keep accurate medical records inhibits APHIS inspectors to evaluate the quality of medical care provided by the facility. The facility must record all treatments, testing, preventions vaccinations and all other medical procedures required by section 3.13 in medical records maintained for each animal at the facility. Correct by, 07-April-2025.
56 dogs recorded (33 adults · 23 puppies).
The licensee had multiple dogs he did not document he followed the vets corrective measures. The licensee corrected this issue during the inspection. Corrected on: 8/13/2025
62 dogs recorded (28 adults · 34 puppies).
The facility has not followed vaccination protocol outlined in the program of veterinary care. The facility has not administered the rabies vaccine to approximately 28 adult dogs in accordance with the approved vaccination schedule. The dogs are approximately 4 months overdue for the rabies vaccination. Failure to provide vaccinations on a schedule approved by the attending veterinarian leads to an increased risk of contagious and/or deadly diseases in the dogs. Correct by ensuring that vaccinations for contagious and/or deadly diseases in accordance with a schedule approved by the attending veterinarian are implemented. Correct by, 20-May-2026.
Yes. Inspectors recorded 7 problems across 16 visits. Each one is quoted in full above, in the inspector's own words.
At the most recent inspection on file, May 6, 2026, inspectors counted 62 dogs (28 adults · 34 puppies). The count is taken by the inspector on the day, so it moves with litters and sales.
The records name Bichon Frise. Breeds come from the inspection paperwork, so a kennel may keep others that were never written down.
Kennels near this one, and others recording the same breeds.
| Kennel | Location | Why related | Dogs | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy A Yoder – A & B Kennel | Sugarcreek, OH | Nearby · same town | 36 dogs | 13 notes |
| David J Schlabach | Sugarcreek, OH | Nearby · same town | 78 dogs | 3 notes |
| Eli J Mast – E & A Kennel | Sugarcreek, OH | Nearby · same town | 36 dogs | 6 notes |
| Enos & Ruby Troyer | Sugarcreek, OH | Nearby · same town | 50 dogs | 4 notes |
| Abe C Raber – Willow Creek Kennel | Fresno, OH | Same breed · Bichon Frise | 251 dogs | No notes |
| Abe R Yoder – Hollowside Puppies / Woodside Kennel / Treeline Kennel | Alexandria, OH | Same breed · Bichon Frise | 212 dogs | 10 notes |
Showing 6 related kennelsView all 472 kennels in Ohio →
Share your firsthand experience getting a puppy from this breeder. Responses are anonymous, reviewed before publication, and kept separate from public inspection records.
This profile includes public USDA and Ohio inspection and licensing records. Notes describe conditions documented on the inspection dates shown.
If information is inaccurate or out of date, please let us know.
Submit a correctionWe collect and organize public records from government sources, including USDA APHIS and state departments of agriculture. We do not conduct our own inspections.
Learn how our data works →They summarize public licensing and inspection records from the agencies shown.
Records are updated as new public documents are collected and reviewed.
No. Pawthenticity organizes public records and does not provide endorsements.
Pawthenticity is reader supported. Your gift helps bring more public inspection records into the open, so people can make better-informed choices for dogs.
Support the database →