Breeder snapshot
Dog breeder in Ash Flat, AR. 27 dogs at last count. USDA inspectors cited 10 problems across 11 reports. Every report is free to read.
Ash Flat, Arkansas
Dog breeder in Ash Flat, AR. 27 dogs at last count. USDA inspectors cited 10 problems across 11 reports. Every report is free to read.
Misty Means – Ash Flat, AR is linked to 11 public inspection reports, carrying 10 inspector findings, from October 2020 to April 2026.
Across 10 inspections between October 2020 and April 2026, inspectors recorded between 2 dogs and 38 dogs at Misty Means – Ash Flat, AR. The most recent count was 27 dogs on April 8, 2026.
| Date | Licence | Type | Dogs counted | Inspector findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 7, 2020 | USDA 71-A-1415 | Pre-license inspection | 13 dogs | None |
| July 8, 2021 | USDA 71-A-1415 | Attempted inspection | No access | None |
| July 12, 2021 | USDA 71-A-1415 | Routine inspection | 25 dogs | None |
| June 14, 2023 | USDA 71-A-1415 | Routine inspection | 32 dogs | 6 findings |
| June 15, 2023 | USDA 71-A-1415 | Focused inspection | 2 dogs | None |
| August 30, 2023 | USDA 71-A-1415 | Routine inspection | 37 dogs | 2 findings |
| November 8, 2023 | USDA 71-A-1415 | Routine inspection | 25 dogs | None |
| May 17, 2024 | USDA 71-A-1415 | Re-license inspection | 38 dogs | None |
| January 27, 2025 | USDA 71-A-1415 | Routine inspection | 20 dogs | None |
| August 11, 2025 | USDA 71-A-1415 | Routine inspection | 17 dogs | 2 findings |
| April 8, 2026 | USDA 71-A-1415 | Routine inspection | 27 dogs | None |
32 dogs recorded (22 adults · 10 puppies).
A 2-year-old, male, black French Bulldog with microchip 99200000378304 was noted with multiple areas of patchy or partial hair loss and red skin – to include all four legs and feet, belly, face, and neck. The dog was noted scratching during inspection. The skin was reddened in many areas and there were multiple red bumps or lesions. The toenails were also overgrown.
** A 2-year-old, female English Bulldog with microchip 956000013899933 was noted squinting with both eyes and with eyelids appearing wet. Upon closer examination both eyes had thick white-yellow discharge on the surface of the eye and surrounding fur and the tissue around both eyes was red and swollen.
There was one dog out of 22 that had no official form of identification on it at time of inspection. Identification is essential to ensure that each dog can be properly identified and to facilitate accurate record keeping and tracking. This dog must be identified by means of an official tag affixed to a collar, legible tattoo marking approved by the Administrator, or microchip. The licensee must ensure that all dogs have proper identification on them at all times. Correct by June 21st, 2023.
The licensee is not properly identifying puppies that are less than 16 weeks old. Nine puppies from 2 different litters are being housed in the same primary enclosure and had no form of individual identification. Appropriate identification of dogs and puppies is necessary to meet recordkeeping requirements for inventory, disposition, transport, and healthcare documentation. The licensee must properly identify puppies with an acceptable form of identification, which include a cage card (if litters are not comingled), a microchip, a collar and tag, or a plastic-type collar with the required information legibly written. Correct by: June 21st, 2023.
One of the 22 dogs on hand was not listed on APHIS Form 7005.
** Multiple 7006 records were missing required information – to include: Date of Disposition, Complete Buyer information, Dealer’s License Number, Identification Number and Age or Date of Birth.
37 dogs recorded (20 adults · 17 puppies).
In three enclosures, each with one dog, there were empty water bowls, with no other water available. When water was presented, the dogs drank for 1-2 minutes. Lack of water could cause the dogs to become dehydrated or other health issues. Having potable water available continuously is important to the health of the dogs. The licensee must ensure all dogs have continuous access to potable water. Corrected during inspection.
The licensee had no documentation that the adult dogs had been vaccinated for Parvo/Distemper in the last 12 months as directed by the Program of Veterinary Care (PVC). Following the PVC and vaccinating for diseases such as Parvo/Distemper are necessary to prevent these diseases, which can cause significant harm, to include death. The licensee must follow the PVC as directed by the Attending Veterinarian for all dogs. The licensee must keep medical records for the dogs and make the records available to the inspector upon request. To be corrected by: September 13th, 2023
17 dogs recorded (16 adults · 1 puppy).
The attending veterinarian has not visited the facility in the last 12 months. The last facility visit conducted by the attending veterinarian was completed on May 6, 2024. Regularly scheduled visits to the facility allow the attending veterinarian to assess the adequacy of veterinary care and ensure the health and well-being of the dogs. The written program of veterinary care must include regularly scheduled visits, not less than every 12 months, by the attending veterinarian to all premises where all animals are kept. The licensee must ensure the attending veterinarian visits the facility not less than once every 12 months. Correct by September 12, 2025.
The facility is not following the program of veterinary care which indicates one dog should be tested annually for heartworm disease. The last heartworm test was completed May 15, 2024. Not performing tests as directed by the program of veterinary care could lead to undetected problems that can result in illness and infection in the dogs. The licensee must follow the program of veterinary care in accordance with a schedule approved by the attending veterinarian for the sampling and treatment of parasites. Correct by August 26, 2025.
Yes. Inspectors recorded 10 problems across 11 visits. Each one is quoted in full above, in the inspector's own words.
At the most recent inspection on file, April 8, 2026, inspectors counted 27 dogs (19 adults · 8 puppies). The count is taken by the inspector on the day, so it moves with litters and sales.
The records name English Bulldog, French Bulldog. Breeds come from the inspection paperwork, so a kennel may keep others that were never written down.
Kennels near this one, and others recording the same breeds.
| Kennel | Location | Why related | Dogs | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shaun Merrell – Wildcat Hollow Retrievers | Hardy, AR | Nearby · 5 mi | 41 dogs | No notes |
| Tammy Zeiger – Caring Hearts Kennel | Hardy, AR | Nearby · 9 mi | 34 dogs | No notes |
| Lyndal Swartzentruber – Pocahontes, AR | Pocahontas, AR | Nearby · 33 mi | 51 dogs | 12 notes |
| Lenny Hostetler | Pocahontas, AR | Nearby · 33 mi | 21 dogs | No notes |
| Caleb Nichols + Kathy Parish – Purple Circle Bulldogs, K & J Kennel | Mansfield, AR | Same breed · English Bulldog | 60 dogs | No notes |
| James Mast | Wesley, AR | Same breed · English Bulldog | 24 dogs | 4 notes |
| Anita Gustin – Kings River Kennel | Berryville, AR | Same breed · French Bulldog | 170 dogs | 25 notes |
| Jamie D Ward – SugarLoaf Puppies | Lead Hill, AR | Same breed · French Bulldog | 38 dogs | No notes |
Showing 8 related kennelsView all 73 kennels in Arkansas →
Share your firsthand experience getting a puppy from this breeder. Responses are anonymous, reviewed before publication, and kept separate from public inspection records.
This profile includes public USDA and Ohio inspection and licensing records. Notes describe conditions documented on the inspection dates shown.
If information is inaccurate or out of date, please let us know.
Submit a correctionWe collect and organize public records from government sources, including USDA APHIS and state departments of agriculture. We do not conduct our own inspections.
Learn how our data works →They summarize public licensing and inspection records from the agencies shown.
Records are updated as new public documents are collected and reviewed.
No. Pawthenticity organizes public records and does not provide endorsements.
Pawthenticity is reader supported. Your gift helps bring more public inspection records into the open, so people can make better-informed choices for dogs.
Support the database →