21 total dogs
No findings
Catherine Mast
C & C Kennel
Horrible Hundred
Bogard, MO
Breeder Snapshot
Catherine Mast is a USDA-licensed dog breeder in Bogard, Missouri. Pawthenticity has 17 USDA inspections on file, with the earliest from 2014. The most recent was September 9, 2025, with 62 dogs on site. Across these inspections, USDA inspectors have documented 7 citations. See the inspection timeline below with dog counts, violation categories, inspector quotes, and links to the original PDF reports.
- Recent Dog Total
- 62
- USDA Citations
- 7
- USDA License
- 43-A-5842
- USDA License Exp
- 3/21/2028
Breed(s) Offered
According to public sources, Catherine Mast raises the following breed(s): Rottweiler, Shetland Sheepdog, Siberian Husky.
Compiled from publicly available sources, which may include breeders' public listings, inspection reports, pet store records, and Certificates of Veterinary Inspections (CVIs). While we strive for accuracy, this information may not be accurate, current, or complete.
USDA Inspections
USDA inspectors visit licensed dog breeders to check that their facilities meet federal Animal Welfare Act standards — housing, food and water, veterinary care, sanitation, and how the dogs are handled. Each visit produces a public report through the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). For citations, we've included the first sentence of the report. Click the PDF to read the entire inspection.
-
-
1 CITATION40 total dogsPens lack head space
“Two enclosures measuring 26 inches tall contained a total of six Siberian Huskies that measured in height from 22 inches to 26 inches tall. These enclosures only allow 0-4 inches of the required additional head space.”
-
72 total dogsNo findings
-
87 total dogsNo findings
-
5 CITATIONS100 total dogsSheltie very thinHusky loose stool
“A Sheltie ... felt thin upon palpation. The ridges on the spine and the ribs were easily palpable. ... Female Husky ... has significant, explosive creamy to tan-colored loose stool.”
Damaged flooringChewed doghouse“The flooring in 3 enclosures (containing 5 dogs) is in various stages of disrepair. The flooring is soft or has come un-joined ... A doghouse (containing 2 dogs) had the entire front left corner chewed and missing.”
Hair, dirt, grime, feces buildup under pen flooring“The Whelp portion of the facility (housing 4 dogs 10 puppies) had a extreme amount of hair, dirt, grime and fecal build up hanging on the underside of the enclosure flooring on the inside of the building.”
Not enough shade“5 dogs in the new addition did not have adequate shade to protect all the dogs from the suns rays at the same time.”
Insufficient windbreak“Two dogs in an outdoor enclosure did not have a sufficient windbreak. The windbreak provided did not sufficiently protect the open area allowing the dogs entrance.”
-
1 CITATION116 total dogsDirectRepeatRottweiler (Rocky) ear wounds with flies, treatment not documentedExpired medication
“There was an adult, male Rottweiler ... housed outdoors which had a reddened, superficial lesion with no hair ... on the outside of each ear ... multiple flies covering both lesions ... there was no documentation that the dog was being treated with this ointment ... There was a bottle of ceftiofur in the whelp building ... which expired in January 2013 ... intermingled with other medications which were currently being used at the facility and was therefore ready for use.”
-
1 total dogsNo findings
-
144 total dogsNo findings
-
75 total dogsNo findings
-
93 total dogsNo findings
-
99 total dogsNo findings
-
131 total dogsNo findings
-
55 total dogsNo findings
-
64 total dogsNo findings
-
81 total dogsNo findings
-
73 total dogsNo findings
-
62 total dogsNo findings
Counts include adults and puppies. The dog-count color shows kennel size: green for smaller kennels, yellow for mid-size, and red for the largest (150 or more dogs). In the findings column, a red finding marks a critical citation.
Horrible Hundred
The Humane Society’s “Horrible Hundred” is an annual report that highlights dog breeders across the United States with repeated or serious animal-welfare concerns. Below is a summary of the concerns noted in the report(s):
2016: Emaciated dog; Explosive diarrhea; Inadequate veterinary care
2017: Rottweiler with ear lesions; Flies around lesions; Expired medication
Click a year to open that report, or learn more about the Horrible Hundred here.
The Humane Society's Horrible Hundred report is the result of extensive research and investigation. Please consider supporting the Humane Society's efforts with a donation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Catherine Mast a USDA-licensed dog breeder?
Catherine Mast is registered with the U.S. Department of Agriculture under license number 43-A-5842. The license expiration date on file is 3/21/2028. For current license status, check the USDA APHIS public database.
How many dogs did Catherine Mast have at the most recent USDA inspection?
USDA's most recent inspection counted 62 total dogs on site. This count includes adults and puppies, and reflects that specific day.
How many USDA citations does Catherine Mast have on record?
Across all USDA inspections on file, inspectors have documented 7 citations. You can see the full breakdown in the inspection list above.
Where is Catherine Mast located?
Catherine Mast's facility is registered in Bogard, MO according to USDA records.
Has Catherine Mast held more than one USDA license?
Catherine Mast's current USDA license is 43-A-5842. If a previous license is listed in the profile header above, this breeder has held more than one USDA license over time.
Where can I view Catherine Mast's original USDA inspection reports?
Every inspection on this profile links to the original USDA PDF — the same document inspectors filed. Click any inspection above to open the source report.
Concerned about an animal's welfare? You can file a complaint with the Companion Animal Protection Society (CAPS), an independent nonprofit that investigates conditions at breeders and pet shops. File a complaint with CAPS.
Pawthenticity summarizes public inspection records from USDA APHIS to help people make informed decisions. The findings, citation codes, and dates shown are drawn directly from those records and reflect conditions documented on the inspection date(s) shown — they may not reflect current operations. Category and severity labels are our summary of the USDA's own findings, not independent judgments about a breeder. If you believe any information here is inaccurate or out of date, please submit a correction.
